Doe Lasagna Need To Be Coverd While Cooking?

SAILING AGAINST POWER NEEDED. STATEMENT

Summary of introductory remarks "Raul Sendic, the Tupamaro" by JORGE ZABALZA

POWER AGAINST YOU SHOULD BROWSE

This last Sunday in November 1958 turned fifteen. That same day national elections were held that whites defeated the Reds, while in internal motto, right-wing coalition (Herrera and Nardone) beat Blanca Democratic Union, whose cast is highlighted by the leader ability to hide the most reactionary ideas. In our department doubled whites the red and the list headed rural blacksmith father doubled his rivals within the National Party. Therefore, my father was elected to the National Director of Government time, Senator and Mayor of Lavalleja. As "worked" like crazy during the whole campaign, was happier than a dog with two tails. It was the best birthday present, the feast was done in the streets of the city of Minas, surrounded by cheering voters, welcomed everyone.
On 1 March 59 was the change of rulers. Enthusiastic about the speech that was whipping the peasantry invaded the capital to assist in the eviction of the "communist veneer 15 "Luis Batlle Berres. A small crowd left unseen Allied Park. Castles Ataliva once told me that even neighboring Bernabé Rivera, his hometown, perhaps the most isolated country, came from far away by truck to toast the victory of the "botudos against galerudos." Meanwhile
Nardone, Juan José Gari, Faustino Harrison and my father met with U.S. Ambassador to cook the stew; result: A year later, the counter Azzini signed the first letter of intent with the Fund Uruguay money. So a teenager I learned that the leaders have the ability to distort reality and make that reality, twisted by demagoguery, then meat on people, even intellectuals of the stature of Claudio Williman Methol Ferré. Delight of those below the top business ... and long live democracy!
After 93 years of Colorado Party's monopoly had been peaceful rotation of the cast of government, no military riots and threatening speeches. At that Uruguay, 1959, the Executive Branch was chartered and minority representation, the budgetary initiative lay primarily in the parliament (parliamentary procedure), the influence of the evil totalitarian, the international communism was under control in Uruguay, where there was confidence in the staff of leaders of traditional parties, which is essential for the smooth functioning damper system.
He had set the autonomy of the university and the student co-government, power that enabled the FEUU Ernesto Che Guevara invited to speak at the auditorium in 1961. Perhaps impressed by these formal appearances, his speech invited us to take care of the democratic freedoms that prevailed in the Switzerland of America. The newspaper El Pais and magazines LIFE VISION and comparing our democracy commoner with the queen of all democracies, the United States. A democratic apotheosis.
A against the current climate, Raul Sendic wrote in the weekly "EL SOL" in 1958: "The regime that prevails in our country has a face and a mask. The mask is the appearance of freedom and democracy that only the rich experience and shown to the outside. " Raised under the shadow of the ideological wing of the owners of Uruguay, having read them, those words of Raul nonsense I have seemed incomprehensible that he refused to enjoy the spiritual welfare causes bourgeois democracy, my father qualified people to thought well of "children of leftists ultrismo Sorocabana Coffee."
However, Sendic reflections shod like a glove on the reality of many people: the dairy farm laborers beaten by the police to claim his, UTE workers who had come down the lever, the port and refrigerators that suffered police occupation of the Villa del Cerro, workers in rice, sugar beet and sugar cane ... possibly the vast majority of them had voted their employers, but union struggles "fuel the brain" and the employees knew very well the real face of democracy. When five years later took the white rulers first steps safety of workers arose within those many who accompanied Raul when he chose the gun as a tool of struggle. It was an ideological choice individual and collective, driven by the desire to place the horizon in front of the revolutionary social and political struggles. Option horizon that were paid with hundreds lives between 1966 and 1985, accounted lives in enforced disappearances, deaths in battle, murder in the streets, in the torture and prisons.
The barracks are still keeping their abominable secrets, these officials to chat openly in their casinos, but hide the judiciary and the public. While not know the truth about these crimes Uruguayan democracy will remain a lie. A "new official" education in the law of "omerta", learn to lie to the people and escape justice, to justify crimes against humanity as pragmatic necessities of war "subversive" believe integrating a higher caste, which guards the "high values \u200b\u200bthat made the country." To make matters worse his convictions are confirmed when the commander Rosales and the four generals of division are allowed to defend the general impunity Dalmao, imprisoned for terrorist state. The same double standard practiced in the Congo and Haiti, schools where they learn to control and repress their people as they talk about peace, to dehumanize guise of "humanitarian missions". In the current armed forces, bourgeois democracy is raising condor chicks to start in the eyes of birds tomorrow.
Who decides the amount of wages of workers, of all the private and public? The "economic team", with Fernando Lorenzo Pedro Buonomo head and number two, involved both in advising venture capitalists. With Tabaré Aguerre, rancher and "producer" rice. Ministers coming from the business, where they were educated by the rate of return and "good business", ie how to screw employees. Solidarity is a verse to coax Frente. Daily
out to explain, with audacity and impudence, to those who understand and who do not, that in the next five years will remain the same economic policies of the previous five years, therefore, in the period 2010 -2015: no redistribution of income or wealth! Not fulfill what was promised in the election campaign. Is explained in the hermetic language of their profession so that no one understands a lot and every thirty seconds, repeating the word magic "social policies", fetish to catch voters and console the poor who are on the canvas. The only way to redistribute material is taken so that the wage bill to grow much more than GDP growth, a policy that the "economic team" and the government behind it are not willing to take because they do not want to break with social class owner of Uruguay .. . that, indeed, are at the same time, the owners of this democracy.
Therefore, the inequality will be maintained the social divide will remain higher than before 2002. Each year the settlements continue to grow with the homeless who can not pay rent or fees, four out of ten teenagers will continue not to enter the labor market because they are literate enough, the interior ministers still amazed at the growth of robberies and trafficking in cocaine base ... also continue to increase the number of zero kilometers purchased by the owners of fields, one in a thousand Uruguayans, who watched as they enlarged the estate without having to work, simply because of increased land prices in recent seven years, more 30 billion dollars in total appropriated the estates in this way, equivalent to what the Uruguay produces per year. Enough to buy several democracies ....
The rich will become richer and the poor throw them a few bucks more for the taking as can be, to continue indulging his silence demobilized from the proper conduct of business in Uruguay. In between, the unionized workers, aware that the prices increase production and international demand are keen to take the time to rise and fight for a substantial improvement in income. Eventually his battles clarify the understanding and allow many to discover the real boundary, which separates Uruguay owners of employees, regardless of the party colors.
The U.S. ambassador, a certain "Mr. Nelson, here in Santa Catalina, a couple of blocks from home, as he placed the cornerstone of future training ground for the" peace missions ", said Uruguay and Empire share the concepts of freedom, democracy and human rights ... As no one came out refuting government or a single word, the question arises: is it true what this man says?, Is not there differences between U.S. democracy and this democracy to Uruguay XXI century?, " contain the same principles of freedom and humanity? Then, one can say that we are a disaster, we live a semblance of democratic life, just the heat a little class struggle, showing teeth and out to exercise power State, police and troops pouring into the streets, throwing them over which they have the audacity to claim back wages to achieve the promised redistribution of income.
More than half a century of "recent history" stretched to my old sixty-seven fifteen years, thanks to the simple fact of survival I have the privilege of knowing this new version of the apotheosis of democracy. New bottles, of course, but the same old wines as ever. Distrust of the democratic euphoria, I refuse to buy the beads that were sold before the Uruguay Vallista, I refuse to dawn bitten by the same snake that bit me fifty years ago as a teenager ruralista blacksmith.

democracy in Uruguay is cut by the barrack secret dungeons and falsified by the demagoguery of the leaders .... do not believe in this kind of democracy as alien to the dispossessed, as socially unjust, as protective of impunity. I feel I must say, the front, although most believe more in the congratulations of Hilary Clinton in the anti outbursts but ... Would not have had enough of both lines?, Do not you fall indigestible many frogs?

Patrick Ewings For Sale

TO CHANGE Agroecology is AN OPTION OF SURVIVAL

For Ing Agr Fernando Queiroz Armand Ugón *

neoliberal globalization, trade liberalization policies of our economies and markets, the continued and growing structural adjustment, together with the landing of large agribusiness corporations, we have imposed their laws and rules that go through plunder nature, creating imbalances, generating disease and hunger, at the expense of multiplying your profits and hegemony in global commodity chains in an integrated manner, ie, control production raw materials, processing, marketing and consumption.

These are the reasons why we are facing an environmental catastrophe is characterized by accelerated deforestation, soil erosion, exacerbated growth of cities (for rural migration, among other causes) overexploitation of natural resources and increasing inequality.

can not transform the nature of goods and services forever, as required by this global model and unsustainable . The appropriation of natural resources to as a commodity, is only intended to increase the gain and profit, and it becomes increasingly resisted by the people.

sovereignty for survival

Food sovereignty does not only refer to the production of food to prevent starvation of the population, but also means ensuring that food is optimal for biological health, mental and spiritual human being. In this sense, it is necessary to promote a paradigm shift in the way food is produced, how it is distributed and exchanged, the way we consume and the manner in which the consumer relates to the production process.

If a country can not decide how their food production, then is far from having food sovereignty.

The advance of agricultural frontier driven by biofuels is an attack on food sovereignty in the South, as land for agricultural production is being used as growing to feed cars. The amount of grain needed to fill a tank of about 100 liters with ethanol once, enough to feed a person for a year. Biofuel production affects directly on consumers, increasing the cost of food.

Of all human activities, agriculture is applied to a larger area, which involves us in a growing conflict between the forms and styles of doing agriculture, satisfying basic needs and the sustainability of the natural environment.

More productivity and more poverty

control over our seeds by large multinationals such as Monsanto, Dupont , Syngenta, Bayer , Dow , BASF , is the first step toward loss of food sovereignty, due to changes in the logic of production.

"disaster capitalism that uses to generate new business leads and generate new disasters like these, then there will be new business. "

The farm is located in close interdependence with nature. The agricultural sector remains the main country's export engine. Over 85 percent of exports has this origin: meat, wool, dairy, grains, oilseeds, citrus, honey, wine, rice and timber. While everyone accepts this economic importance, yet few people realize that this sector is embedded in an ecological system . Our wealth as a country of agriculture and tourism are based on the nature. This framework identifies constraints to production and tourism.

In our country there is evidence that although increasing productivity, it was a strong land degradation, water problems (organic pollution by nitrates, for availability) indiscriminate application of pesticides and growing.

The alleged increase in productivity of modern technology packages are achieved from large additional inputs of energy and matter. Thus, each extra kilogram obtained from the soil requires proportionally more and more contributions, where the efficiency of the process, instead of growing, is reduced. Although yields per hectare increase, it requires increasingly expensive inputs, intensive, sophisticated and often polluting. Many of these environmental impacts go unnoticed by its diffuse, as with the erosion or alteration of hydrological cycles, which makes it difficult to put in evidence.

However, a correct balance of agricultural productivity should include these environmental costs, and possibly Many activities are defined as profitable today actually be generating economic deficits are transferred to the State or the rest of society. It also is intensifying the concentration of land ownership, the delocalisation of the same, the purchase of national agribusiness by foreign capital and the quarrel between the country's natural resources by the major world powers and their mega . In less than six years on 24 percent of the country's land changed hands, primarily for the benefit of foreigners. From 2000 until the first half of 2006 were sold in Uruguay 3.9 million hectares representing almost 24 percent of the land surface .

As in the case of monoculture eucalyptus, pine, sugar cane, soybeans and others, the problem is not the tree or grass or legume, but the model production technology in which it implements. All of these crops and plantations are common problems that cause-injure the land rights of farmers, soil erosion, alter the water cycle, contaminated with pesticides, remove other ecosystems and reduce biodiversity.

Reclaiming the benefit of the majority

Sustainability and healthy agriculture beyond mere conservation of natural resources and environment to become the expression economic development and social equity.

The transition from a conventional to sustainable agriculture is a slow, complex, that can hardly happen naturally. Means having a set of economic instruments, social and political as well as technology, to guide producers and consumers to a healthy agriculture.

In many countries in Europe farmers are subsidized to understand that agriculture is not just producing a commodity (raw material), but implies a set of values, a culture that must be protected, preserved and recognized. Meanwhile, in our case is an attack against an integrated rural development . undoubtedly promote a diversified production system that preserves the rural landscape and production, would maintain environmental quality, preserve biodiversity, protect soil resources, watersheds sustainably manage and sustain family field.

Our country must implement massive and sustained funding in their systems of formal and informal "bottom" educating for life, human beings become capable of coping with the dominant culture critically and transform it. Shall support measures and legislation to regulate the use, ownership and foreign ownership of land, promoting environmental and land use participatory and sustainable, ensuring support permanent, diversified agriculture, agro-ecological production, family farmers and rural youth, promoting the use of appropriate technologies.

Conventional agriculture has impacts on soil (changes in the microflora, microfauna, erosion), biodiversity (simplification of systems, running of the agricultural and livestock) in the disappearance of native species on the health of consumers and farm workers (residues of pesticides), pollution of waterways, pollution, genetic (GM), pollution air. All these negative impacts are not calculated to set the final price of products (wheat, milk, meat, fruits, vegetables), but should be incorporated into the final price and consider what they are: costs.

This will become clear that conventional agriculture is not only socially and environmentally damaging, but that is not even economically viable.

Opposition to the spread of agro-ecological production is based on concepts not technical or economic, but ideological and political.

To really have a truly sustainable land management requires a joint effort with all stakeholders in a region to ensure a path that leads us to achieve: food sovereignty through local production systems based agroecological , diversity and no monoculture, decentralization and not the concentration, allowing access to water, seeds, land and the use of various renewable energy. say, a new broader sense of our passing through this world, of our coexistence as human beings, to make Earth, humanity can and continue to have future ".

As the Brazilian theologian Leonardo Boff : "It is not enough to adapt to new realities, nor is it sufficient to lessen the harmful effects of global warming global, but you have to go to something more profound: we must reestablish the sense of life, we must recreate a new spirituality is

* agronomist, teacher and producer agroecological

Literature consulted

-Biofuels. World Rainforest Movement . Ecoportal.net . July 2007

-Biofuels versus food sovereignty. Silvia Ribeiro. ETC Group researcher. Ecoportal.net.

-Alternative to Genetically Modified Food: The Rise of Sustainable Agriculture. Carmelo Ruiz Marrero . Ecoportal.net. July 2007

-Biofuels and farming. Victor Quintana. Biodiversity in Latin America. August 2007.

-In search of food sovereignty. Maya Rivera and Sergio Arispe Mazorco Barrientos. Biodiversity in Latin America. August 2007.

-Rural Development in Argentina the XXI century. Walter Pengue. Ecoportal.net. August 2007.

-La option ecological farming. Eduardo Gudynas Researcher CLAES - (Latin American Center Social Ecology).

"The social and ecological tragedy of agricultural biofuel production in America. Miguel Altieri and Elizabeth Bravo. LATIN AMERICAN RED ONE FREE TRANSGENIC. BULLETIN 235. April 2007

Image Of What Krealkaline Can Do

Carmen Aristegui after being fired.

A fellow orthodox, dogmatic, etc, it is clarified. The journalist Carmen Aristegui, we are aware that a person with opposing ideologies to our philosophies and doctrines. But driven by the recognition of the professionalism of this woman, for her struggle to appear professionally independent, and the events that have touched this woman lately living this human being convincingly Democrat, the largest of our respect. Knowing that we fight and we fight. AP Hill blog.

"Very good morning friends, citizens, colleagues and journalists

allow me to read a text I have written to assume a public stand on my morning news farewell News MVS occurred this weekend ... issue that has generated many expressions of solidarity from here thank you.
This is an event which, although affecting the life and work of a group of people, including myself included ... have a greater significance to the limited number ... I want to express my views on what is on larger scope of this event that impacts in various ways to Mexican society ... A society these days and hours has shown determination and ability to respond to a fact that offends and hurts their fundamental rights ... The vigorous strong and determined voice of thousands of people in social networks, Twitter, Facebook, other forms and manifestations on the streets are, in themselves, a great event ... The big news that we are alive ... That Mexicans despite the escalating violence, death and horror that accompanies us every day we are here to recognize ourselves in the mirror and fight for a better Mexico ...
thank all these expressions and I am here, excited about their existence and the vital sign that accompanies ... Embrace those in all colors and with different languages \u200b\u200bhave appeared in Contrary to all luc3es an authoritarian and unconscionable and unacceptable ... such an event is only imaginable in dictatorships that no want 'to Mexico ... Punished for comment or questioning to the rulers.
The issue hits us all ... not only affects us as professionals and citizens who were removed from a space. .. it also affects the media and the business group that develops for various productive activities in the country. This group is headed by a family whom I esteem and value. Founded by one of the most loved and respected in the industry as was Don Joaquín Vargas Gómez ... I sincerely regret that their names are being mowed down on social networking for the decision. We must ask ourselves, why this happened and how things went.

-

On Friday February 4, on my right to freedom of expression formulated an editorial comment that alluded to a news event incontrovertible. Following the events of the Chamber of Deputies yesterday, when a group of legislators showed a banner with the photo of Felipe Calderón with red eyes in which read: "You let a drunk drive your car? "No, really? And why leave it to lead the country? Of course there was a great rispidez that drove him to suspend the meeting on the legislative floor ... and there was a story to tell our audiences ... My colleague Omar Aguilar presented with great professionalism this news story neatly, clearly and with sufficient ... never hidden or blanket, or the content of the blanket, or the authors of the blanket ... not truqueo nothing for viewers and listeners did not find out what he was saying the blanket ... and not trapping anyone present to the public, and the public deserves, all expressions in different directions were issued about ... Our audience was well informed about the event and enough information to make your own assessment ... The information presented to me I served as a basis for formulating the editorial said ... "Let's forget the cartoon, said ..." take the issue seriously ... and did some other considerations ... ended up with a formal challenge to the authorities ... Does alcohol problems or the President of the Republic? ... I have no way to confirm this but, if any, would be a delicate thing we should know ... there's nothing offensive about the question ... especially if it's something that, exist in nature affect decisions that impact at all times to millions of people around the country ...

The editorial closed by saying that the track-and given its public exposure through the blanket of legislators, deserved a serious response, formal and official of the Republic Presidency itself ...
The President did not answer the journalist ... immediately demanded that the owners, not the reporter, "an immediate public apology for the tremendous courage ... thus demonstrating a degree of irritability and intolerance that speak for themselves some kind of problem ... That, of course, must also be discussed.
acknowledge that the question was hard ... but libelous or defamatory in any way ... not at any point was transgressed the code of ethics that has been mentioned ... It was quite simply the formulation of a valid question ... Asked by a journalist whose intention was well defined ... The health status and degree of equilibrium of a representative, of course it is a matter of clear public interest ... The Mexican society has a right to know with certainty, without insults, without caricature on the health conditions of those who have taken and will continue to take very serious decisions everyday that impact on the fate of a nation. And boy does it has impacted the nation's fate decisions from the Pines in this administration ...
The reason for my dismissal, he said, was my refusal to apologize and transgress the code of ethics ... Thing that is false and only became an alibi ... at this time not only did not retract, and I apologize, because there is nothing to forgive, but rather affirm the relevance of the Presidency of the Republic is revealed about ...
sorry yes, personally, that the President and his family have been offended by the question ... no there, nor is there in the formulation of my question no intention or offense ... I regret that they have been offended ... it is clear that this happened, but yet, so the question remains ...
The exercise of power makes public figures are subject to scrutiny and questions to which others would not be subject by reason, precisely, of their responsibilities and the impact of their decisions ... In a democracy it is part of the game ... Did not Bill Clinton to talk of semen deposited in the blue dress a girl before an audience of millions? ... Is not perhaps the health status of Dilma Roussef was the subject of public debate before reaching be president now is ...? "" Are not the debauchery and excesses of Silvio Berlusconi matter of national debate ...?? Why in Mexico is punishable by dismissal of a journalist who dares to ask??? ... Why in Mexico means employers may be subjected to undue pressure to mute their communities?? ... Why Mexican society has to settle for a single view of things?? ... Why fatally have to live with the existence of a television duopoly that not only degrades the screens degrading and harmful programs like the recently released, but it is already in itself a power that has damaged the national democratic life??

-

Why Mexico is trapped in a spiral of degradation and infamy without doing anything about it??? ... Why, as they say the signatories of the letters published protest these days ... we left them thus lead the country??
What kind of democracy is this that an editorial comment that angered the ruling ... the head is cut who said? ... why the political power can lead to the extreme, scandal, conflict, deliberately, to make things impossible to achieve both the employer as a journalist causing the break? ? ... The question is, how they could raise from Los Pinos, the level of demand asking about the humiliation, for an absolutely oversized? How does an employer to whom we as decent led him to behave this way ... how 'could make him feel compelled to such an extent as to require the reading of a letter, obviously not written by me in terms that were alien to me and of course do not match with what my conscience dictated ... to meet the presidential wrath? ... A reading requirement unworthy of that letter made me who knew beforehand that I would reject it ... It was to that end.

-

For the degree of vulnerability in which there are those who have businesses or concessions in the world of telecommunications and media ... In this case there is a set of concessions in the game ... and the final decision on what happens in them is in the drawer of the President. What should be technical, legal and lawful, in reality is a political issue ... discretionary approval has gone through all legal and technical filters to be taken, is subject to final leave of the President ... and even came to the end of President ... That is the dominant powers in telecommunications excessive power which prevents the entry of new competitors and there really makes life impossible ...
persists to this day, a factor which influences and distorts the relationship of government media, which is the political discretion in making decisions and issuing endorsements concessions in the field of telecommunications. This is one of the main reasons why Mexico does not fully deployed as a fundamental right of freedom of expression ... Issues to be resolved with greater legal certainty regarding time, insurance plans, business plan investment and end up issues of political and not technical areas in the field. This is the case of concessions in the 2.5 GHz band have several operators in the country of MVS Communications owns most of them. Although they had already filed all the technical requirements of competition, and the general favorable for some commissioners COFETEL ... and favorable opinion of the COFECO ... and have waiting-to-risk of losing millions quantities of domestic and foreign investors ... despite having everything in order and a strong market for wrongly ... ... the decision has been inexplicably delayed for five years ...! Taking everything in order ... There is no technical reason, technological, legal, economic or today is not sufficiently satisfied. The only reason that today prevent MVS Communications to deploy a national network of Internet bandwidth to compete with large conglomerates is utterly and politics .... Because it stands as a sword of Damocles in the old authoritarian view of the carrot and the stick ... you're good, I endorse your award ... you misbehave you stop it, you deny it. This pressure is the environment in which the relationship unfolds not only dealers with the government, but in the environment as the work unfolds and the professional performance of hundreds of professionals in their relationship with media companies. That is the daily battle. To the extent that communicators and entrepreneurs struggle against the government, to that extent the audience gain or lose information. The most grotesque and paradox of this reality, is that most benefit from this legacy of the old regime are the large monopolies that are now able to maintain this design to prevent new entrants. And here again into the enormous responsibility of a legislature that has preferred to maintain unwritten rules rather than a modern law of legal certainty for business, safeguard the rights of journalists and guarantee the right to information I thank all the people ... by the way, from here the debate and pronouncements that since Congress did yesterday by lawmakers on the case of our farewell ... News
However, do not serve much the democratization of the media censorship ordered by an event like this, while it coexists with laws that could and should be modified to benefit the whole population and not a few ...
In this environment of government pressure to some communications companies serving a phenomenon even more serious than the former state control over the media. It is the weakening of the state and its institutions by virtue of a contingency policy that goes from the President of the Republic, through the Chambers of Congress, wide swaths of the judiciary bodies Regulators at the hands of new or factual informal powers have succeeded in imposing its logic of blackmail and intimidation, because that is what it is-that has led to levels of audacity and a power calculation to replace, at least partially branches of government ... There is, for example, a TV bench in Congress, some regulators subjects captured by its regulated ... As ever in the history of the Mexican State have been allowed to grow to these authorities in Mexico have reached the point ... I dare to say ... also wanted to take over the Presidency of the Republic itself ... Otherwise it would explain the multi-million dollar investment they have made to build him a presidential candidate Gov. ... mexiquense
The background of what happened in our case and that has generated all of these reactions has to do with precisely this climate. For that reason is that a company decides, contrary to their interests, to cancel at the time of greatest expansion, the most prestigious, most influential, an area of \u200b\u200bcritical information, debate and opinion that has been valued by advertisers and audiences ... So take a suicidal decision.
Like so many others, this is a company improperly put pressure incompatible with a democratic system and rule of law ... While we do not change the structures that are the basis of this unhealthy relationship, the critical influence spaces are continually harassed and collectively the media eventually standardize or unify its news coverage . Flattens the free opinion, drop the debate and inhibited the critical behavior ... that seriously harms democracy and, of course, fundamental rights and citizens of this country.

-

"Well, I say, now we do with what happened? Do we accept what happened that does not suit you or anyone opt for the ethics of responsibility and seek a way? ... without giving up but, without requiring the other to its knees ...
Joaquín Vargas knows that I did not violate any code ethics ... you know what happened, know that it was an alibi ... you know, because the suffering every day, of the true reasons behind this decision is about to cost us ... I say head up because I will raise a way out ... dignified, decent and intelligent ... I know if the shot.
Joaquin knows how few I'm talking about ... I tell MVS that does not give you a taste for those who relish this failure ...
What happened between Friday and the weekend from Los Pinos, our offices also I do not know if other- Distillery and the Meridien is something that does not deserve anyone who harms us all, and that the only thing that is going to serve for the relief the absurdity of a presidential meltdown and appreciation of those who prefer that no one competes, that no issues or that little question.
does not deserve a professional group that was doing work that is brutally interrupted ... I do not deserve it, of course hearings, do not deserve the Vargas family because they have been placed in a perverse dilemma where they have calibrated as a business group have a harder time against the government and powers that pressure: if the head of Aristegui or band of 2.5 GHz ... No country deserves it ...
The Mexican Association of Information Law, to which I belong and that heads the master Raul Trejo Delabre ... has said that our air output is terrible news for Mexican society ... The decision is unfortunate for everyone ... "Lose MVS whose editorial independence is compromised due to suspension this space, lose the journalist and his wide audience. Lose the Presidency of the Republic, which gave rise to demands for Carmen Aristegui apologize for the remark he made on Friday February 4. "... AMEDOI required the presidency" than facts, and specifically in this case, ensure the right to freedom of expression and the right of citizens to information "... asked to MVS" to reconsider the dismissal of Aristegui "And it's exactly what I apply for them far from here ...
The country is no more to keep losing the spaces that we won; the country is not for us to continue haggling over rights to which we belong. Mexico is undergoing a critical moment ... the level of decay, violence and institutional weakness is profoundly serious ... to stand still ... We can win the amazement when Mexico's future has been clouded ... We need informed, alert, critical ... we can not afford to throw away the gains ... to realize that what would justify??
Our transition to democracy has taken a turn tragic ... The levels of violence, decomposition and degradation public life are reaching levels of scandal ... The Mexican political class has not lived up to the challenges of national seems unaware of the progress of these new phenomena of power that have eaten away and undermined as never before ... Do we make further progress without opposing a social force, at least identify, discuss and analyze the ...?
Do we stay in the shade of Political subjected to special interests because before govern well, you have to go on TV ... or timid and irresponsible rulers away from concentrations temper monopoly has made them grow, creating monsters of power that are subject ... and against which they dare not to take one step ...
This morning I call to reverse the effects of this ominous ...
I tend the hand and listen to those on the street and say "you have to return ..." ... I am willing to return to air this coming Monday ... as long as they meet a basic condition and only ... That MVS announce officially withdrawing from the statement with my departure which falsely claims that "transgressed, our code of ethics ... and that I promoted spreading rumors and news ... As a result calls publish another official statement from the company where my integrity assessment of ethics which call into question sought to be compensated.
If MVS accept it, is tacitly recognize the real nature of what happened ... That would be enough.
Joaquin knows it very well ... my professional and ethical integrity was never in question ... that was really an excuse to make a decision imposed on him ... the real problem lies elsewhere ... go back into the air and be shown ...
The Presidency will have to make an assessment of what happened ... .. Serenamente Without hate .. With the serenity that involves making decisions on behalf of others ... and accepting, but not like that citizens and journalists are entitled to ask ... to seek and to criticize what we deem appropriate.
I'm here to make this call ... To reverse an ominous fact as it happened ... in a dignified, decent and smart .. Betting on the truth but, without breaking or built ...
My dear friend Jorge Ramos, wrote a few years ago a text magnificent titled "The right to ask" ... I recalled there Oriana Falacci the teacher who said that there should be no question prohibited. All you can ask ... more so if it is to ask people in power ...
Jorge also had an interview with President Vicente Fox ... there were questions on the environment because it appeared listless, with no momentum, no major ; proposals ... the reporter asked the president ... if this does not feed rumors, but trying to clarify them ... "Take Prozac? ... Fox asked, looked the journalist and said simply "NO" ... Of course I did not like the question but answered it ... As Ramos wrote: No question prohibited ... There is no stupid question ... And when the opportunity arises, you have to do it ... Even if the last time ...
From here I close my comments do not add more because the approach is made and what remains is waiting for responses ...
THANKS TO ALL AND GOOD DAY ... "
Carmen Aristegui